Terrorists’ Target Selection


Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Terrorists’ Target Selection file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Terrorists’ Target Selection book. Happy reading Terrorists’ Target Selection Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Terrorists’ Target Selection at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Terrorists’ Target Selection Pocket Guide.


Download options

The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on September 27, Online Focus. Public Broadcasting Service. May 13, Archived from the original on January 25, City date nears, militias seen as gaining strength". Archived from the original on January 5, The Tampa Tribune. Retrieved May 25, The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on June 29, Daily News. New York. Archived from the original on February 27, Cole; Elaine Shannon April 28, Archived from the original on February 11, Fox News Channel. April 26, Archived from the original on February 9, Kovaleski July 2, The Washington Post.

Archived from the original on January 31, April 27, American Terrorist. Scientific American. Bibcode : SciAm. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 7, April 21, Archived from the original on June 5, May—June Public Administration Review. Archived from the original on March 7, Retrieved March 20, Archived from the original on July 28, Forensic Intelligence International. Archived PDF from the original on October 29, Retrieved June 5, Archived from the original on January 19, Boca Raton News.

December 16, Archived from the original on November 25, Retrieved June 29, The Philadelphia Inquirer. The Denver Post.

Archived from the original on June 16, Retrieved November 8, News OK. Archived from the original on May 10, Retrieved September 11, David; Keith D. Missouri University of Science and Technology. Archived from the original on February 5, Retrieved June 21, May 12, U-T San Diego. Archived from the original on March 13, Homeland Security Television. In Their Name. Archived PDF from the original on January 21, Retrieved June 26, Final Report. Murrah Federal Building". Archived from the original on November 5, Understanding Terrorism in America.

Gene Corley ; Mete A. Sozen; Charles H. Thornton August Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. Fletcher; Gary S. Fuis; Trond Ryberg; Thomas M. Brocher; Christopher M. Dietel Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. Bibcode : EOSTr.. Archived from the original on November 13, The Indianapolis Star. August 9, Archived from the original on April 28, LA Weekly. Archived from the original on May 25, Archived from the original on June 9, Retrieved June 14, Shawnee News-Star.

Kingman Daily Miner. Retrieved June 27, Archived from the original on January 12, CourtTV News. February 20, Archived from the original on February 24, The Buffalo News. Cole August 14, American Journalism Review. Archived from the original on December 5, Season April 19, Bibcode : Natur. General Services Administration. Archived from the original PDF on December 24, Journal of the American Medical Association.

The Oklahoman. Archived from the original on June 24, Retrieved June 24, Archived from the original on November 30, Archived from the original on September 28, The Army Lawyer. Fire Engineering. Retrieved November 17, The Oklahoma City Bombing. Archived from the original on April 27, Archived from the original on November 4, HighBeam Research. San Antonio Express-News. Treating Compassion Fatigue. All-American Monster. Prometheus Books. Archived from the original on March 8, The Pantagraph. June 5, San Diego Blood Bank. Archived from the original on March 2, Government Accountability Office.

Archived PDF from the original on December 24, Retrieved September 25, Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on October 25, Goodwill Industries. Archived from the original on April 26, Louis Post-Dispatch. April 20, The Star. March 29, The State Journal-Register. Archived from the original on February 29, Tourists of History. Pulitzer Prize. Archived from the original on May 24, News Channel 4.

Terrorists' Target Selection

Archived from the original on March 22, Retrieved March 22, Military Medicine. Archived from the original on February 19, Retrieved March 3, Retrieved November 27, The Dallas Morning News. Philadelphia Inquirer. Guys and Guns Amok. Retrieved November 10, Archived PDF from the original on April 5, Archived from the original on November 22, Retrieved December 5, Chicago Sun-Times.

Archived from the original on June 11, Retrieved June 30, — via HighBeam. Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on March 1, The Guardian. May 11, Archived from the original on January 13, Retrieved February 27, Retrieved March 25, Gainesville Sun. February 21, Patriots, Politics, and the Oklahoma City Bombing. University of Missouri—Kansas City. Archived from the original on February 23, Case No. March 25, Archived from the original on August 11, Archived from the original on June 27, Oklahoma State Courts Network.

Archived from the original on December 27, Archived from the original on June 23, Archived from the original on January 15, June 6, Archived from the original on March 25, Archived from the original on March 31, June 11, Archived from the original on July 27, Archived from the original Video on November 3, Archived from the original on January 22, San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on March 6, Retrieved May 12, The Register-Guard. Retrieved June 11, April 2, Archived from the original on February 8, January 20, October 9, Archived from the original on October 12, Retrieved July 12, The results obtained in Graph 1 are then used as inputs to Graphs 2 and 3.

The results of Graph 2 are then used in Graph 3. Graph 2 Figure 8 represents an influence diagram from the perspective of administration of industrial facility subjected to terrorist threat. It allows one to assess expected disutilities related to various countermeasures made by the administration of the facility involved. The graph permits estimation of expected disutilities to facility administration in case of various countermeasures adopted by the facility administration, to rank countermeasures.

Graph 3 Figure 9 represents an influence diagram from the perspective of local community authorities. Graph 2 and Graph 3 permit assessment of risk reduction benefits of different countermeasures and their costs. The structure of the influence diagrams and probabilistic dependences between the variables should be developed by the joint efforts of specialists representing a broad spectrum of disciplines these include specialists in terrorist threat assessment, reliability theory, social sciences, loss estimation , each providing insights in their relevant area of expertise.

The model permits identification of effects of different factors and parameter values on the likelihood of success of different attack scenarios and on the expected utilities to different sides involved.


  • Related Articles?
  • AIR for Javascript Developers Pocket Guide!
  • Sources.
  • My Google Chromebook;
  • Just Enough Liebling: Classic Work by the Legendary New Yorker Writer.
  • Contact Person.

The model described above can be used in dynamic fashion via discrete time steps. At each step, each player updates his beliefs, objectives, and decisions based on his previous step. To address the dynamics of security problem, one needs to model moves and countermoves of all three sides involved, changes in the structure of terrorist organizations and systems of protection, and lessons learned by all parties from previous attacks.

The complexity of modern engineering systems and their interdependence with other systems make them vulnerable to attacks of technological and intelligent terrorism. This complexity stems largely from the vast functional and spatial dependencies and nonlinear interactions between the components of CES as well as from interdependencies that exist among the CESs which enable failures to cascade within one system and pass from one system to another. Different historical, economic, political, social, as well as cultural traditions have formed different approaches to ensuring safety of complex engineering systems.


  • Duel for the Golan: The 100-Hour Battle That Saved Israel?
  • Key Points.
  • C. J. M. Drake, Terrorists' Target Selection - PhilPapers.
  • Common Conditions in Gynaecology: A Problem-Solving Approach.
  • Terrorists' Target Selection.
  • Women in the ancient world: the Arethusa papers;
  • The Whole Foods Kosher Kitchen.

Contemporary CESs, i. Their significant spatial extension makes their functioning dependent on many factors and events in different parts of the world. It is impossible to solve this problem without joining efforts of experts in different fields and taking into account technical, social, psychological, and cultural-historical aspects. This is being done in the assumption that a bounded set of credible design-basis impacts and subsequent failure scenarios could be determined for the CES, thus allowing one to create a system of protection barriers and safeguards that could secure the CES from the identified impacts with required substantially and high probability.

This bounded set of impacts referred to as design-basis impacts includes normal operation events as well as abnormal events component failures, human errors, extreme environmental loads, attacks of technological terrorism on CES that are expected to occur or might occur at least once during the lifetime of the CES.


  1. Search form.
  2. Monet;
  3. Art and autoradiography: Insights into the genesis of paintings by Rembrandt, Van Dyck, and Vermeer;
  4. Terrorists' Target Selection by C. J. M. Drake | | Booktopia.
  5. The Dead of Jericho (Inspector Morse 5).
  6. The currently available approach to ensuring security of complex engineering systems is based on the so-called protection approach that provides for the development of a set of protection barriers against the list of terrorist attack scenarios that were identified in advance. Within this approach, attacks of technological terrorism should be included into the list of design-basis events.

    To protect CESs from these scenarios of terrorist attacks, the following types of protection barriers should be developed see Figure 11 : Rigid protection barrier protection barrier that requires a powerful impact to be broken.

    Emergency Management

    Natural protection barrier involves the use of passive natural phenomena and processes aimed at limiting the scales of the accident. Application of this protection approach allows one to reduce risks of design-basis scenarios of technological terrorism compare FN curves 1 and 2; Figure FN curves before and after realization of protection and resilience measures. In currently applied protection-based approach, a number of low-probability impacts of extreme intensity are neglected as being practically incredible.

    Other impacts such as attacks of intelligent terrorism are not identified and, consequently, not analyzed. Such impacts are classified as beyond design-basis impacts. Thus, the issue of protection of CES from beyond design-basis impacts has not been addressed in a proper manner. These impacts however can cause large-scale disasters of extreme severity and induce tremendous property losses and a great number of victims. Complex engineering systems are becoming global networks.

    The protection-based approach is focused on developing safety barriers for countering the identified scenarios of terrorist attacks that were included in the list of design-basis events. This approach however has the weakness of neglecting the possibility of beyond design-basis events. To overcome this weakness, a new comprehensive strategy is needed. The current accident models and risk assessment techniques such as fault and event tree analysis are not adequate to account for the complexity of modern engineering systems.

    Terrorists Target Selection by Drake & C.

    Due to rapid technological and societal developments of the recent decades, modern engineering systems are becoming steadily more complex. As a result, it is impossible to describe the performance of CESs in every detail. In other words for complex engineering systems, it is practically impossible to define a bounded set of design-basis impacts that are expected to occur or might occur at least once during the lifetime of the CES. This problem can be solved by including the concept of resilience in the processes of designing and ensuring the safety and security of CESs [ 26 , 27 ].

    The proposed approach should not be considered as a substitute but rather a supplement to the traditional one. This comprehensive approach will be based on such concepts as resilience to provide more adequate explanations of accidents as well as identify ways to reduce risks caused by beyond design-basis impacts. This is determined by the degree to which the CES is capable of organizing itself to increase its capacity, of learning from past disasters for better future protection, and to improve risk reduction measures.

    Measures to increase CES resilience. As previously stated, due to the complexity of modern engineering systems and their potentially large-scale catastrophes, in order to ensure security of such systems, one needs to move beyond traditional design-basis risk management framework.

    That means that if the beyond design-basis accidents are to be considered, the scope of the analysis should be widened. Security-related efforts should be focused not only on the development of protection barriers and safeguards from predetermined postulated set of design-basis attacks of technological terrorism but also on additional set of measures aimed at increasing complex engineering system resilience that would prevent catastrophic failure and long-term dysfunctioning of CESs in case of beyond design-basis attacks. Application of such comprehensive protection and resilience focused approach allows one to reduce risks of beyond design-basis scenarios of intelligent terrorism compare FN curves 2 and 3; Figure This work was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant no.

    Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3. Help us write another book on this subject and reach those readers. Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications. Edited by Andrey Kostogryzov. We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books.

    Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. Downloaded: Abstract The chapter will present the classification of the types of modern terrorism and describe scenarios and probabilistic models of ordinary, technological, and the so-called intelligent terrorism that are distinguished by their triggering events, propagation modes, damaging factors, probabilities, and consequences.

    Development of the American Economy.

    Australia’s Strategy for Protecting Crowded Places from Terrorism - Tasmania Police

    Economic Fluctuations and Growth. International Finance and Macroeconomics. International Trade and Investment. Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. The Science of Science Funding Initiative. The Women Working Longer Project.

    Terrorists’ Target Selection Terrorists’ Target Selection
    Terrorists’ Target Selection Terrorists’ Target Selection
    Terrorists’ Target Selection Terrorists’ Target Selection
    Terrorists’ Target Selection Terrorists’ Target Selection
    Terrorists’ Target Selection Terrorists’ Target Selection

Related Terrorists’ Target Selection



Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved